"Brilliance invents. Genius copies." And now with a new focus on civilizing the real estate megaprojects of the Middle East, East Asia and even the USA.
I don't know. I happen to believe that the removal of Saddam Hussein was a good thing, because he was one of the world's more dreadful tyrants, and he is no longer killing Iraqis. To me, that on its own seems a good reason for fighting the war.
No question about that, Michael. That's my ambivalence. The war has done good things but we are nowhere near the end game and my doubts are whether our President has the skill to carry it off. That's why I distinguish between the wisdom of the timing/method/followthrow etc etc of the war and the supposed "immorality of it.
There can be a lauable & moral goal -- saving a dog marooned on a somewhat-fronzen lake" -- but simply walking out there to fetch it might be very unwise.
very persuasive argument you have there!
Posted by: yon | Feb 17, 2004 at 10:44 AM
I don't know. I happen to believe that the removal of Saddam Hussein was a good thing, because he was one of the world's more dreadful tyrants, and he is no longer killing Iraqis. To me, that on its own seems a good reason for fighting the war.
Posted by: Michael Jennings | Feb 18, 2004 at 03:37 PM
No question about that, Michael. That's my ambivalence. The war has done good things but we are nowhere near the end game and my doubts are whether our President has the skill to carry it off. That's why I distinguish between the wisdom of the timing/method/followthrow etc etc of the war and the supposed "immorality of it.
There can be a lauable & moral goal -- saving a dog marooned on a somewhat-fronzen lake" -- but simply walking out there to fetch it might be very unwise.
Posted by: David Sucher | Feb 18, 2004 at 05:25 PM