« Arithmetic for editors? | Main | This animated GIF illustrates what animates the city.
Now how do I improve it? »

Sep 23, 2004

"Anyhoo" asks a good question.

I was reminded of City Comforts by this BBC piece on the rebuilding of the World Trade Centre site, which states that the new transit station is set back from the street, for security reasons. I wonder what Mr Sucher makes of the impact of terrorism threat on the urban environment. As one of his central tenets of urbanism seems to be that buildings should meet the street, how does that mesh with pedestrian plazas to fend off vehicular access? And what should one make the of occurrence of concrete blocks to do the same? How long will it be before we see public art flanking the road, which looks an awful lot like those trapezoid world war 2 anti-tank lumps of concrete, that still dot occasional beaches and haphazard bits of countryside?

Phil Langdon knows a lot more about that issue than I do. See the September, 2004 issue of New Urban News, for instance. (Scroll down page to commentary on "Urban fallout in American war on terrorism.")

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1645/1131060

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Anyhoo" asks a good question.:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Three Rules of Urban Design

Buy the book

The essence of "city-ness"

Search five years of this blog


My own favorite posts