« Ian Nairn? | Main | Has bluster, posturing and fluff triumphed? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452239b69e200d8346c276a69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Optimism!:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
![[book cover]](http://citycomfortsblog.typepad.com/cities/cc-cover-100w.jpg)
These maps are wonderful. The US red/blue map of electoral college votes has been published so widely without annotation, that it has come to mean "what states went for Bush."
Intentional or not, graphics can greatly distort data, and the less people are inclined to read, the greater the power of these images.
The best part of seeing these variations, is that they show a less divisive election. I hope these are published widely.
Posted by: Tommer Peterson | Nov 10, 2004 at 11:48 PM
Yes, they are very informative. I beleive Edward Tufte would approve. The Urban Archipalago, the most recent feature from Seattle's alt-weekly, The Stranger echos this apparent corrolation between density/diversity and liberalism/tollerance. Worthwhile, imho if you can get past the characteristically cynical tone.
Posted by: Scott Neilson | Nov 13, 2004 at 08:42 PM
For an annotation of this map, see here: http://urbanist.typepad.com/jarrett_walker_home/2004/11/election_rorsch.html
For a response to the article on the "Urban Archipelago," see here:
http://urbanist.typepad.com/jarrett_walker_home/2004/11/update_should_b.html
Peace, Jarrett
Posted by: Jarrett | Nov 26, 2004 at 07:29 PM