« Dost thou blog, too, JRoth? | Main | Critics can destroy as well as enrich »

May 11, 2005

Let property-owners finance the marginal cost since they receive the marginal benefit

The party-line emerges: Viaduct tunnel cost offset by other gains, study says.

One of the big issues in Seattle is whether the (supposedly-failing) Alaskan Way Viaduct along the downtown waterfront should be
• rebuilt,
• replaced with a tunnel
• (or simply removed.)

The pro-tunnel forces are selling this project as a "free" one in which the rise in property values exceeds the costs. The obvious answer is "Great! You don't need us then. You property-owners go form a Local Improvement District and pay the marginal cost and make a lot of money!"

The study also said that a tunnel along Seattle's central waterfront would add up to $1 billion a year over the next 25 years in enhanced value of the waterfront. It also would bring up to $1 billion in new visitor spending and up to $960 million in increased property values...the enhanced value was calculated by assuming 20 to 30 million local visits each year, at $2 a visit, and a 1 percent increase in out-of-town visitors...said the added property value would come from improved views and less noise, which can lead to higher rents and higher property sales...looked at other projects around the country where similar projects led to financial bonanzas. He said removing Harbor Drive in Portland led to property-value increases of 10 percent a year, and removing the Embarcadero along the San Francisco Bay waterfront increased property values by 300 percent.

Is it likely that identifiable property-owners who will directly and measurably benefit will agree to pay? When pigs fly.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452239b69e200d83423c04053ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Let property-owners finance the marginal cost since they receive the marginal benefit:

» Highway Robbery? from Cascadia Scorecard Weblog
I haven't had much new to say about Seattle's Alaskan Way Viaduct saga, despite the fact that there have been a bunch of significant developments of late: Late last month, Governor Gregoire signed off on a 9.5 cents per gallon [Read More]

» Highway Robbery? from Cascadia Scorecard Weblog
I haven't had much new to say about Seattle's Alaskan Way Viaduct saga, despite the fact that there have been a bunch of significant developments of late: Late last month, Governor Gregoire signed off on a 9.5 cents per gallon [Read More]

» Highway Robbery? from Cascadia Scorecard Weblog
I haven't had much new to say about Seattle's Alaskan Way Viaduct saga, despite the fact that there have been a bunch of significant developments of late: Late last month, Governor Gregoire signed off on a 9.5 cents per gallon [Read More]

» Highway Robbery? from Cascadia Scorecard Weblog
I haven't had much new to say about Seattle's Alaskan Way Viaduct saga, despite the fact that there have been a bunch of significant developments of late: Late last month, Governor Gregoire signed off on a 9.5 cents per gallon [Read More]

» Highway Robbery? from Cascadia Scorecard Weblog
I haven't had much new to say about Seattle's Alaskan Way Viaduct saga, despite the fact that there have been a bunch of significant developments of late: Late last month, Governor Gregoire signed off on a 9.5 cents per gallon [Read More]

Comments


I haven't seen the study or methodology, but logic would suggest that removing the viaduct is what would cause any increase in economic activity or property values. But it doesn't follow that this gain, if it could even be captured in taxes, should be plowed back into a tunnel project. Perhaps this money would be better off floating elsewhere in the economy.

In other words, the benefit of removing the viaduct is absolute by itself-- you don't have to build a tunnel to capture the benefit. You just have to have the courage to close the highway.

ARK.
Astute comment and well-stated.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Mobilise this Blog

Three Rules of Urban Design

Buy the book

The essence of "city-ness"

Search five years of this blog


My own favorite posts