They also have a Tunnel to sell you
Gregoire calls for voters to decide future of viaduct.
Gregoire didn't suggest that two other options for the viaduct be put before voters: retrofitting the existing structure or replacing the roadway with a surface boulevard and expanded mass transit. State engineers have said a retrofit wouldn't be cost-effective, and a surface street couldn't handle the traffic carried by the viaduct.
Big loser? (besides commonsense) — Gregoire's political future.
![[book cover]](http://citycomfortsblog.typepad.com/cities/cc-cover-100w.jpg)

I am disappointed in her move but I think it's shrewd. She avoids a clash with
Nickels and the Council and the elevated road wins the vote. Her problem is solved
and, as is usually the case, the voters get what they deserve.
Posted by: kieth Nissen | Dec 16, 2006 at 09:38 PM